On 6/23/06, Michael Rogers <m.rogers at cs.ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
> If the email-like address is just for the mail client's convenience,
> does it actually need to encode the whole SSK? Could you keep a mapping
> inside freemail from aliases like dbkr at freemail to SSKs?

You'd also want it to be possible to write it on a note and give it to
someone, not that the curent address scheme is easy to do that with.

>
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
> Dave Baker wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 June 2006 22:03, Michael Rogers wrote:
> >> David Sowder (Zothar) wrote:
> >>> Convert to base-36 ([0-9a-z]) instead of base-16 (hex)?
> >> Or Base32? Case-insensitive, URL-safe, and easy to convert to/from raw
> >> bytes.
> >
> > Doesn't make it massively better:
> >
> > Base32:
> > dbkr at 
> > MQ3U2RL2NNBFGZKMFVUGGYZSIRDE26DIONIUQQ22NREHISSHIVLGSV2JGN3TKYSHNFUDILBTMM4U43KVJNCHCVKFMIWTCVSGOZHXG3LMNBHFONLKKF4HMYTPGZXUC5DYJVWTMUCVI44CYQKRIFBECQKF.freemail
> >
> > vs.
> >
> > Base16:
> > dbkr at 
> > 64374d457a6b4253654c2d6863633244464d7868735148435a6c48744a47455669574933773562476968342c3363394e6d554b44715545622d315646764f736d6c684e57356a517876626f366f4174784d6d36505547382c41514142414145.freemail
> >
> > The only implementations of Base36 I've found convert numbers to base 36
> > (which is easy in Java) but not strings / byte arrays. If the above if
> > anything to go by, it's not going to save much anyway.
> >
> > I'll stick with base 32 for the time being.
> >
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base32
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Michael
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Tech mailing list
> >> Tech at freenetproject.org
> >> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tech mailing list
> > Tech at freenetproject.org
> > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tech mailing list
> Tech at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
>

Reply via email to