Okay, then this is my TODO list: - Finish my current work on Fproxy. For 0.7-a1, we will not have support for queueing a request from fproxy, but it will warn the user if it is over 4MB. Est. 2 hours. - Enable non-testnet mode. - Get hold of nextgens and try to get ready for 0.7-a1. When everything is ready I will send you an announcement to tidy up and send.
Reasonable? PS the routing issues don't seem as bad as they had seemed at first; http://127.0.0.1:9888/freenet:CHK at YZSmDBHt4Bg~u09BUyag3jBZLS8Y226KigwCJLk0Fxc,shaEdN6LinCKLeMm4lTlffbvT2KjL0X6xiwhNbhzIeo,AAEC--8/IMG_0221.html On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 09:37:23AM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > I think people generally do trust their friends, that is what makes > them friends. I think we should go with the darknet, but make it easy > for people to run a testnet node too (this process should be described > separately though to avoid confusion). > > Ian. > > On 3/29/06, Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > At what point do we want to support true darknet? It may very well be > > that we will actually get more testnet testers if we support a true > > darknet as well, since many will run both networks. > > > > Do we have enough security at present to provide a true darknet? Well, > > if you trust your friends, then I'd say just about; MITM is possible on > > connection setup, that's the main issue. If you don't trust your > > friends, no. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060329/b5bbc756/attachment.pgp>
