On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 12:49:44PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > >Ummm... they are SSKs. They don't include cross-links: an ARK is > >exclusively about the one node. > > Yes but if three clients retrieve the same ARK then those three clients > are neighbours of the same node. That allows you to map the topology.
Ah ok. Well the original criticisms still stand: ARKs are no different to any other keys, and any public gateway will be shut down or used to identify nodes/users. Rendezvous transports may be more realistic for such extreme cases where we can't connect to a single node... These are low-bandwidth things we use to exchange a few bytes. Email, IRC, Jabber, SMS, DNS cache exploits... > > Cheers, > Michael -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060503/311ed936/attachment.pgp>
