On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:03:22 +0100 Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) <nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote:
> * bbackde at googlemail.com <bbackde at googlemail.com> [2007-01-04 > 15:48:09]: > > > [...] > > > > But the current behavior often leads to downloads that have more > > than 100% progress *g* > > Is it *that* important to have an accurate progress bar ? some blocks > can take *ages* to be retrived whereas some will come up > instantaneously... Imho we can't provide a reliable > percentage/ETA/whatever for small files even if we had detailled stats > on what's going on. That's probably very true, but I always wonder whether > 100% means that there is a bug in fproxy / freenet and it will never finish because it didn't notice that it was finished already or something. It's probably a bad idea to say that the download is > 100%, from a user point of view. That an ETA will not be that reliable is a different topic if you ask me. > Btw, haven't you ever experienced the same "bug" on the queue toadlet > on fproxy ? > [...] One of my downloads on fproxy's queue page says it's at 101.2%. I think that this is this bug? Regards, Milan -- Milan Holzaepfel <mail(a)mjh(d)name> <URL:http://mjh.name/> pub 4096R/C790FC23 EB8E 5E81 81E3 53A9 9B74 B895 5179 54C0 C790 FC23 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20070106/a015ffe4/attachment.pgp>
