On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:22:02AM +0000, Michael Rogers wrote: > > It looks like about 70% of deployed NATs are full cone, so 81% of > NAT-to-NAT connections should work without UPnP, NAT-PMP or manual port > forwarding.
That is definitely not the case for current Freenet users. I have hardly ever heard of full cone NATs in relation to freenet, but lots of users apparently have restricted cones; this is the preliminary conclusion of a quick survey on frost anyway. Restricted cone is the common one. > > Cheers, > Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20070310/d9375097/attachment.pgp>
