http://www.fsfeurope.org/projects/gplv3/brussels-rms-transcript.en.html
RMS on GPL3 draft 3 (significant changes from draft 2). "So we are compatible with that clause in the Apache licence but a few months ago we noticed that there was another clause in the Apache licence requiring indemnity in certain cases, and there's no way we can be compatible with that. So we're not going to achieve that goal of making GPL version three compatible with the existing Apache licence. I regret that." Which means we can't comply 100% with the law while including Apache Commons code in Freenet. :| Except maybe by adding an exception to the license, which requires permission of all copyright holders, and that's a *MAJOR* PITA. More on GPL3 draft 3: http://www.fsfeurope.org/projects/gplv3/gplv3.en.html Rationale for changes from draft 2: http://gplv3.fsf.org/rationale
