Matthew Toseland pisze: > On Friday 16 November 2007 13:37, xpdf wrote: > >> Matthew Toseland pisze: >> >>> On Friday 16 November 2007 08:33, xpdf wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Jabber is good idea to make a freenet faster & moore knowing. The >>>> protocol & servers is stable. Users & account are moore. many servers >>>> have SSL. plugins to popular communicators. >>>> >>
> > Routing all traffic through the Jabber central servers will a) be very slow > not more than at present but people who use freenet they will be counted in thousands > and b) constitute a DoS in the eyes of most server operators. > many serwer-s is very good google wp.pl (huge polish portal) etc. > Jabber, IM clients in general, email, and so on, are IMHO in the category of > either: > Hm. why IM? If I tell use jabber protocol to free net not this same to usem IM on freenet. Tell me how many is of servers freenets? How many is servers jabber & client jabber. How many people write aplications to use freenet? Rethink ;) about it. > a) Ways to get onto the network in the first place i.e. exchange darknet refs > or > jabber is naturaly. Naturaly colecting friend in my roster. I know this people. The freenet growing naturaly. > b) Ways to stay on the network: Rendezvous transports. Transports which are > used only for sending the current IP address to a node which is unable to > connect because it doesn't know it. > Yes, but how many users? This is problem. Tor was broken therefore the path message will be short (time), and there nodes are little > Eventually we will have plugins for both data transports (UDP, TCP, HTTP etc) > and rendezvous transports (IM, email etc). > I hate java ;) this serwer not working propertly on many net hardware (routers, small or old computers) not working on many PDA. I think the rewrite a small freenet on jaber protocol will be beter than the present situation
