I'm sorry if this appeared rude, it really was not intended to be. I better add that emoticon next time ;)
Then again, I also had the idea to combine OFFSystem and Freenet. OFF's chunk size is uniformly 128 KiB and these chunks can be reused across different contents, so the datastore would boil down into to a flat heap of simple fragments that become reassembled - rather than encrypted files it is currently. Using fragment cache for local actions and fragment store for specialization is also alot like freenet's store approach. I think Freenet as network transportation layer, OFF-fragments as not-inculpatory-ing storage items, FEC for redundancy and CHK/SSK/USK as metadata that controls filename, mimetype and fragment recombination is a really nice idea, not? Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Friday 12 December 2008 08:51, freenetwork at web.de wrote: > >> great idea. I wonder where you got this from *cough*OFFSystem*cough* >> >> http://offsystem.sourceforge.net/ >> > > No need to be rude, it's an obvious idea. I don't see any reason to think > that > Donald knowingly plagiarised this. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
