This sounds like a good idea! No matter who uses it (fms, frost, thaw) could at least be sure that the sending costed the sender some cpu time. It could also restrict the amount of sent messages at all, considering the same cpu time. So it becomes more expensive and annoying for the spammer. Now its quite easy for him, he could even play crysis in parallell ;)
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Michael Rogers <m.rogers at cs.ucl.ac.uk> wrote: > bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > > If I understand this correct, the node of the sender will have to > > compute a valid > > hash cash before actually sending the key? And receivers can easily check > the > > hash cash and reject keys without a valid hash cash? > > Right - inserts without valid hash cash won't even be forwarded. > > > > Cheers, > Michael > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > -- __________________________________________________ GnuPG key: (0x48DBFA8A) Keyserver: pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de Fingerprint: 477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A __________________________________________________
