On Tuesday 04 March 2008 17:54, Julien Cornuwel wrote: > Matthew Toseland a ?crit : > > >> I must have misunderstood something with how SSK works. Do you mean it's > >> possible for the plugin to insert a new edition without knowledge of > >> other files in it (FMS files) ? If so, can you explain how ? I'm > >> interrested. > > > > I mean you could use the same SSK pubkey. But maybe you could share more than > > that, we really need to minimise polling here.. > > Agreed. If it is possible to update a key without loosing the files > listed in the previous edition you don't know about, that is the way to go.
An SSK key consists of a public key and a filename. Some SSKs are also manifests, this is denoted by a slash. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20080304/7ed702ab/attachment.pgp>
