On Tuesday 04 March 2008 21:27, Stephen Walford wrote: > --- On Thu, 28/2/08, John B?ckstrand <sandos at home.se> wrote: > > see some sensitive information. Hey, I should open up a http proxy for > freenet, and then manually add filters when government agencies start > complaining. The filtered pages would simply say: "please install > freenet to see this page, since the legal system has asked me not to > show this". The hope is that by moderating things manually, I would not > be prosecuted for anything (hopefully) and people will at least get a > chance to see information before it is banned.
It doesn't work that way. They'll sue you for contributory copyright infringement and you'll settle out of court, not being able to afford a good lawyer. Oh and they'll serve *your ISP* with a takedown notice for the entire site. Not you for the one infringing page. Oh and then they'll contact the local paper about your child porn distribution... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20080304/50387d37/attachment.pgp>
