On Tuesday 16 June 2009 21:58:12 Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland skrev: > > But yes, inserting the two main installers into an SSK sequence and having > > nodes download them and allow users to download them *locally* is a good > > idea; this isn't a distribution servlet, it isn't open to the wider world, > > but it allows them to get an installer to send to their friend, even if > > they installed months ago, lost the original installer, and the route by > > which they obtained the installer is now closed. > > It's not a bad idea IMHO. Makes sure that Freenet can survive on its own > even if freenetproject.org is seized. Should be revokable though.
Agreed, this could be related to the auto-update system. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20090617/d2cd9716/attachment.pgp>
