On 11/18/2013 02:40 AM, Michael Pearce wrote: > My plan is to also associate a messaging identity to a Bitcoin > address with a non-zero balance that the user owns (i.e. can sign > with). This should help ensure that there is something closer to a > person attached to the sender. Nothing will be perfect in regards to > spam, but i'm hopeful this will get me close enough. > > Thanks a lot for the link to the Freemail spec. I'm sure i wouldn't > have come across this on my own and gives a good use case of working > with Freenet as a communication layer.
Cool! That sounds interesting indeed. At first glance it sounds like something that could be achieved by signing the WoT ID with the Bitcoin address and adding that as a WoT context/property. Do you plan to do other things that make this not applicable? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20131123/c0732265/attachment-0001.pgp>
