On Sat, 17 Aug 2013, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: > Certainly if they present you with a copy of GPL, some binaries, and no > offer for source code, you can and should ask why. Something has to > be wrong. Either (a) the offer for source is missing, (b) the text of > the GPL is presented unnecessarily. (b) is benign but confusing and > we should ask them to correct it. (a) is copyright infringement, since > it violates GPL.
That "offer" clause has always worried me. Is there anything to say that the offer actually has to be honoured?
