The lgplv2 is one of the least understiod of the open source licenses in my experience.
Anyhow, from my compliance lead on chromecast: Content shell is statically linked. Details on where to get appropriate source + object files for non-source parts can be found at https://code.google.com/p/chromecast-mirrored-source/source/browse/README?repo=chromium&name=1.2 On Oct 6, 2013 5:10 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/6/2013 at 2:17 PM, "Cole Johnson" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> which is LGPL > > There's your answer. Nope. > > Could you elaborate? A huge chunk of code in third_party/WebKit is LGPL > from what I see, > and I'm no expert but I think you aren't allowed to static link to LGPL > code without actually > [1] releasing the source or all the objects to re-link to be compliant. > Correct me if I am wrong. > > [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LGPLStaticVsDynamic > > >
