> From: Allan Irving [mailto:[email protected]] > > Yes, the fact the latest release was signed with their GPG key is worrying.
Umm - Code signing SSL cert. Not gpg. > The fact they suggest using MS Bitlocker > makes it appear much like a prank but then again, who knows? I can say that before this, they had an FAQ stating their absolute position against ever using the TPM. So the idea that this is an official endorsement of bitlocker seems extremely dubious. _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
