David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Adam Levin wrote:
I'm not sure I understand point #2. I mean, what does having a
one-on-one
deal have to do with being a professional? I think the population at
large
would accept as professional many people who don't necessarily deal
"one-on-one". Or, perhaps we need humpty-dumpty to define "one-on-one"?
I think the most important part of #2 is the "the client can't tell if
the work is right" portion rather than the one-on-one portion.
But if you look at the fields that are unquestionably Professional
(with a capital P), almost all of them do end up involving a lot of
one-on-one work. Even if a large Law or Engineering firm, it's still
one-on-one for most work.
Maybe for law, but for professional engineering, the clients are
typically large corporate or government entities; the projects are
things like buildings, bridges, and electrical netwrks; and the ultimate
responsibility is to the public. Not sure how that's one-on-one.
Miles Fidelmn
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/
