We're looking at integrating our *nix machines with our AD servers and  
are trying to find the "Best" way to do this.  In this case I'm  
finding my google-fu isn't working in my favor... there is no shortage  
of information.  Every time I think I have a complete grasp of ways  
this can be done I find one more.  So there are plenty of resources  
for how to do this using technique X, what I really need is some  
feedback from people who are further along in this evolution that can  
give some perspective on which approach they think is the best.

Disclaimer:  I am in the process of learning how these bits fit  
together, and if I've said something truly bizarre it is likely out of  
ignorance not arrogance so I really would appreciate being pointed in  
the right direction.

Relevant background details:
~50 production servers that are centrally managed (unified UID and  
passwords) using homegrown syncing - we would like to move these to AD
Already have AD infrastructure in place authenticating staff work  
stations (~50 workstations)
The servers exist to support our customers (not staff in general)
These servers do not require shared home directories for staff.
Staff accessing these servers are all performing some task relating to  
"administration", though at different levels (tech support through sys  
admin).
        * primary concern is not securing these machines against it's  
legitimate users (so NIS may be acceptable in this environment).
This economy stinks and doing this without any capital expenses is  
very important.

Combinations we are seriously considering (in no particular order):

NIS w/Kerberos (via SFU)

Winbind

Likewise Open

We've found various bits and pieces that seemed promising with each of  
these approaches.  This is our short list of best fit for the problems  
we've got, but perhaps we've overlooked something.  I would really  
appreciate any pro's/con's from the trenches on this topic.  "Likewise  
Open" seems to be the easiest to install at this point, so is slightly  
ahead in our evaluation.

Thanks for your time,

(sidenote:  AD is being chosen because it is existing established  
infrastructure here that looks like it will do the job we need,  
nothing at all against openldap, this is just using the tool that  
we've got so we can focus on solving other challenges.)

Neil Neely
http://neil-neely.blogspot.com




_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to