I am sort of stuck with this until we move to LINUX. That process is 80% finished.
I don't want to mess with the OS. >>> Phil Pennock <[email protected]> 01/10/09 11:18 PM >>> On 2009-01-10 at 22:48 -0500, John BORIS wrote: > Thanks. No we didn't fill any disks. I have about 18 messages hung on > each of the 20 servers. I am about to just delete all of them and > restart things. I did a restart of the mmdf sctipts but that didn't > help. In the past the main relay server used to stop accepting mail > beacause of a bad or malformed email Like you said it is flaky. I > learned this and when mail used to hang on the relay server I would find > the culprit and get delete. This time it is all 20 servers taht sort of > got in unison to be stubborn and stop sending the mail. The relay server > is sending email like a champ. Oh yes, I mercifully forgot about how flaky it got with junk files clogging things up and the clean-up scripts I wrote. They were for my employer and I no longer have copies. Why are you sticking with MMDF, just the cost of migration, or are you stuck using SCO anyway? If your main limitation is the mailstore format for delivered mail, note that Exim also supports that format so can be used as a drop-in upgrade replacement with appropriate configuration. (I believe Exim also compiles on SCO -- there's Makefile and OS header support for the platform but I don't know how extensively it's tested). (Yes, there are other MTAs but I don't know if they have mailstore support) _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
