I've used their http product before and we are currently testing their database product (I haven't used the database product yet, but from what I hear the testing is going well)
the filtering products do a pretty good job, the weakness has been in the administration. they have a learning algorithm to figure out what's 'normal' and then block anything it decides isn't. This part actually works fairly well. for us the administration didn't scale (things like we host a couple thousand secure websites, each with separate certs and the only method for updating certs was a slow graphics-heavy web interface) one problem it has is that there is no way to learn in a development/test environment and then move the learning to another control point. another is that if you have different sites/servers with different combinations of applications useing them, it learns each combination separately (and and depending on what it learns, potentially differently) David Lang On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Allan West wrote: > Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:35:47 -0400 > From: Allan West <al...@cookie.org> > To: 'LOPSA Technical Discussions' <tech@lopsa.org> > Subject: [lopsa-tech] Is anyone using Imperva solutions? > > Does anyone use Imperva <http://www.imperva.com/> solutions for database > auditing or their data discovery tools? I'm getting sales calls, but I > don't know enough about the product field to judge what they're saying > or even who/what to compare them to. > Thanks, Allan > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech@lopsa.org > http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators > http://lopsa.org/ > _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@lopsa.org http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
