"Bret S. Lambert" <bret.lamb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:18:33PM +0000, Luis Henriques wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:52:12PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2010/01/25 00:50, Luis Henriques wrote: > > > > Re-sending with "cvs diff -upRN" > > > > > > Wha, you mean I have to dismantle my AspireOne again and put the > > > minipcie back in to test it? But last time I did that I had to drill > > > out some of the screws :-) (only joking, I can do this on the eee > > > instead, it's far easier to dismantle! and this is great news). > > > > > > Please also send URLs of where the borrowed code is from so the > > > licensing is totally clear. > > > > Here's the link to the Linux ath5k driver: > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.32.y.git;a=tree;f=drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k;h=d625eae851dd0c1e42e52a182d8408ebee855377;hb=a2febcd43d859a48672ad922990bd27e5628271f > > > > (not 100% sure if this is the exact same version I used, can check that > > later if it actually matters.) > > > > File main.c (in directory "..") sets the license to "Dual BSD/GPL". > > IIRC, it's more dependent upon the licence in the individual files, > not the note that satisfies the Linux kernel's just utterly weird > "tell me your license so I can refuse to load you" bits. > > But, the files in there, where they aren't (c) reyk@, appear to be > either straight-up BSD-with-GPL option, or apparently cut-n-paset > from OpenBSD's license.template(!) (as in the file you say is dual- > licensed), so I think you're on solid footing here. > > > > > And the link to the NetBSD driver: > > > > http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/external/isc/atheros_hal/dist/?only_with_tag=MAIN > >
Anyone knows what happened to this? ... or it just got lost in the mist? -- DISCLAIMER: http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/ This message will self-destruct in 3 seconds.
