So, can I remind this simple cleanup?

2010/1/31 Anton Maksimenkov <anton...@gmail.com>:
> Here is some cleanup of uvm_map.c code.
>
> At first, in uvm_map_advice() function.
> Let it looks as simple as uvm_map_inherit() - no need to lock/unlock map
> just to realize that sanity check fail. Also no need to do it in every
loop.
>
> Second, remove redundant "temp_entry" variable from both functions.
> One "entry" variable is enough to do the job.
>
> $ cvs diff -Nup sys/uvm/uvm_map.c
> Index: sys/uvm/uvm_map.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/uvm/uvm_map.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.123
> diff -u -p -r1.123 uvm_map.c
> --- sys/uvm/uvm_map.c   28 Aug 2009 00:40:03 -0000      1.123
> +++ sys/uvm/uvm_map.c   31 Jan 2010 11:35:56 -0000
> @@ -2473,7 +2473,7 @@ int
>  uvm_map_inherit(struct vm_map *map, vaddr_t start, vaddr_t end,
>     vm_inherit_t new_inheritance)
>  {
> -       struct vm_map_entry *entry, *temp_entry;
> +       struct vm_map_entry *entry;
>        UVMHIST_FUNC("uvm_map_inherit"); UVMHIST_CALLED(maphist);
>        UVMHIST_LOG(maphist,"(map=%p,start=0x%lx,end=0x%lx,new_inh=0x%lx)",
>            map, start, end, new_inheritance);
> @@ -2492,11 +2492,10 @@ uvm_map_inherit(struct vm_map *map, vadd
>
>        VM_MAP_RANGE_CHECK(map, start, end);
>
> -       if (uvm_map_lookup_entry(map, start, &temp_entry)) {
> -               entry = temp_entry;
> +       if (uvm_map_lookup_entry(map, start, &entry)) {
>                UVM_MAP_CLIP_START(map, entry, start);
>        } else {
> -               entry = temp_entry->next;
> +               entry = entry->next;
>        }
>
>        while ((entry != &map->header) && (entry->start < end)) {
> @@ -2519,18 +2518,29 @@ uvm_map_inherit(struct vm_map *map, vadd
>  int
>  uvm_map_advice(struct vm_map *map, vaddr_t start, vaddr_t end, int
new_advice)
>  {
> -       struct vm_map_entry *entry, *temp_entry;
> +       struct vm_map_entry *entry;
>        UVMHIST_FUNC("uvm_map_advice"); UVMHIST_CALLED(maphist);
>        UVMHIST_LOG(maphist,"(map=%p,start=0x%lx,end=0x%lx,new_adv=0x%lx)",
>            map, start, end, new_advice);
>
> +       switch (new_advice) {
> +       case MADV_NORMAL:
> +       case MADV_RANDOM:
> +       case MADV_SEQUENTIAL:
> +               /* nothing special here */
> +               break;
> +
> +       default:
> +               UVMHIST_LOG(maphist,"<- done (INVALID ARG)",0,0,0,0);
> +               return (EINVAL);
> +       }
> +
>        vm_map_lock(map);
>        VM_MAP_RANGE_CHECK(map, start, end);
> -       if (uvm_map_lookup_entry(map, start, &temp_entry)) {
> -               entry = temp_entry;
> +       if (uvm_map_lookup_entry(map, start, &entry)) {
>                UVM_MAP_CLIP_START(map, entry, start);
>        } else {
> -               entry = temp_entry->next;
> +               entry = entry->next;
>        }
>
>        /*
> @@ -2539,19 +2549,6 @@ uvm_map_advice(struct vm_map *map, vaddr
>
>        while ((entry != &map->header) && (entry->start < end)) {
>                UVM_MAP_CLIP_END(map, entry, end);
> -
> -               switch (new_advice) {
> -               case MADV_NORMAL:
> -               case MADV_RANDOM:
> -               case MADV_SEQUENTIAL:
> -                       /* nothing special here */
> -                       break;
> -
> -               default:
> -                       vm_map_unlock(map);
> -                       UVMHIST_LOG(maphist,"<- done (INVALID
ARG)",0,0,0,0);
> -                       return (EINVAL);
> -               }
>                entry->advice = new_advice;
>                entry = entry->next;
>        }
>
> --
> antonvm
>



--
antonvm

Reply via email to