On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Ted Unangst wrote: > > > now that the atomic flag is gone, the yield diff is simpler. once again, > > the idea is that unbounded (or of unknown bounds) loops in the kernel are > > bad because you hog the cpu. so be polite and yield from time to time. > > > > anybody use tables heavily want to give it a test? :) > > oops, wrong version. this one yields after a bunch of iterations, not on > the first go-round.
why not move the test into the macro? then you don't vomit magic numbers throughout the file... -d
