> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:27:37 -0500 > From: Ted Unangst <[email protected]> > > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Vladimir Kirillov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi! > > I guess the following is the leftover. > > Thanks, I removed it. I left NLDT at 17, though, because there > doesn't appear to be much benefit in shrinking that vs whatever weird > binary compatibility issues there may be.
Well, changing NLDT to 17 should defenitely be tested, but leaving it at 17 is a bit odd. I'm actually wondering whether the default LDT is necessary at all now that LBSDICALLS_SEL is gone. Then NLDT can go completely.
