On 28 April 2011 07:42, Claudio Jeker <cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:47:41AM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
>> Keeping this up.
>>
>> On 17 March 2011 00:51, Christiano F. Haesbaert <haesba...@haesbaert.org>
>> wrote:
>> > On 12 June 2010 16:26, Christiano F. Haesbaert <haesba...@haesbaert.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> The following will disregard the routing table for multicast packets
>> >> when the application chose the interface with IP_MULTICAST_IF, if not,
>> >> normal lookup will take place.
>> >>
>> >> Ripd now no longer needs to explicitly add the mcast host route to
>> >> bypass the default reject to 224/4, follows the diff to remove it.
>> >>
>> >> Regarding the normal lookup when IP_MULTICAST_IF wan't set, UNP
>> >> regards it as a BSD descendant behaviour, I really don't know anything
>> >> else.
>> >>
>> >> I've tested it in a small setup, if someone could confirm it in a
>> >> scarier environment would be nice.
>> >>
>
> What about this version? It moves the multicast source selection before
> the route selection. IMO this is a nicer way to write this instead of
> making an already complex if statement totaly unreadable.
>
> In the end this will help more daemons to run with multicast_host=NO
> when doing multicast. It also matches the behaviour of SOCK_RAW sockets
> since those bypass this code and so don't suffer from the blackhole route
> added by /etc/netstart.
> --
> :wq Claudio
>
> Index: in_pcb.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet/in_pcb.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.119
> diff -u -p -r1.119 in_pcb.c
> --- in_pcb.c    28 Apr 2011 09:56:27 -0000      1.119
> +++ in_pcb.c    28 Apr 2011 10:35:38 -0000
> @@ -824,6 +824,27 @@ in_selectsrc(struct sockaddr_in *sin, st
>
>        ia = (struct in_ifaddr *)0;
>        /*
> +        * If the destination address is multicast and an outgoing
> +        * interface has been set as a multicast option, use the
> +        * address of that interface as our source address.
> +        */
> +       if (IN_MULTICAST(sin->sin_addr.s_addr) && mopts != NULL) {
> +               struct ifnet *ifp;
> +
> +               if (mopts->imo_multicast_ifp != NULL) {
> +                       ifp = mopts->imo_multicast_ifp;
> +                       TAILQ_FOREACH(ia, &in_ifaddr, ia_list)
> +                               if (ia->ia_ifp == ifp &&
> +                                   rtable_l2(rtableid) == ifp->if_rdomain)
> +                                       break;
> +                       if (ia == 0) {
> +                               *errorp = EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> +                               return NULL;
> +                       }
> +                       return satosin(&ia->ia_addr);
> +               }
> +       }
> +       /*
>         * If route is known or can be allocated now,
>         * our src addr is taken from the i/f, else punt.
>         */
> @@ -872,27 +893,6 @@ in_selectsrc(struct sockaddr_in *sin, st
>                if (ia == 0) {
>                        *errorp = EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>                        return NULL;
> -               }
> -       }
> -       /*
> -        * If the destination address is multicast and an outgoing
> -        * interface has been set as a multicast option, use the
> -        * address of that interface as our source address.
> -        */
> -       if (IN_MULTICAST(sin->sin_addr.s_addr) && mopts != NULL) {
> -               struct ip_moptions *imo;
> -               struct ifnet *ifp;
> -
> -               imo = mopts;
> -               if (imo->imo_multicast_ifp != NULL) {
> -                       ifp = imo->imo_multicast_ifp;
> -                       TAILQ_FOREACH(ia, &in_ifaddr, ia_list)
> -                               if (ia->ia_ifp == ifp)
> -                                       break;
> -                       if (ia == 0) {
> -                               *errorp = EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> -                               return NULL;
> -                       }
>                }
>        }
>        return satosin(&ia->ia_addr);
>

Oh yeah, much nicer :D, I'll test it and report back.

Reply via email to