Just noticed I still have Ms for this. Has it been tested on enough arch yet? So far I know it's been run on
amd64 (sthen) armish (sthen) i386 (aja, sthen) macppc (aja, sthen) loongson (phessler) Any others? Considering how much it sucks if ld.so is broken, it would be good to have reports from a few more arch, I would think hppa and sparc64 as a minimum. On 2011/04/28 08:45, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Sat, 23 Apr 2011, Dale Rahn wrote: > > > Here is a diff that was originally hatched at c2k10 and finally implemented > > at k2k11. This has been tested lightly so needs to be tested on all systems > > with big and small programs. > > > > On some machines this can shave 15% off of the startup time of large > > applications with lots of dynamically loaded libraries. > > > > Please test and let me know if there are any problems found. > > > > Yes I am intentionally cross posting this to ports@ as large ports > > are the most affected by this diff. > > > > Maybe this will finally get ajacoutot@ off my back ;) > > Heh ;-) > > Anyway, I've been running with several variations of that diff on > some machines (i386 and macppc) for several weeks without seeing any > regressions. > And I can confirm large beasts do benefit from it. > > -- > Antoine
