On 10/05/2011 5:34 PM, Artur Grabowski wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Jeff Licquia<j...@licquia.org> wrote:
My question to you is: do you consider the FHS to be relevant to current
and
future development of OpenBSD? If not, is this simply due to lack of
maintenance; would your interest in the FHS be greater with more consistent
updates?
More updates will not atone for "/lib64".
//art
At least /lib64 is better than winblows 64 bit systems
system32 <- 64 bit dll + apps
sysWOW <- 32 bit dll + apps
How's that for backwards compatibility.
Ian McWilliam
