On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 06:44:10PM +0000, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:42:08AM +0000, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > hmm. there are more problems than this: > > > > - some of the pages in htdocs refer to a FAQ page at > > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/misc/FAQ.html. the link doesn;t work > > though. > > > > - misc/index.html refers to FAQ.html, the file you propose to remove. > > > > your intention seems correct though (i agree misc/FAQ.html looks > > broken). > > > > the reference in misc/index.html can be trivially fixed. i've no idea > > about the apache link though. > > > > jmc > > > I would also change link in ssl faq too: > > Index: mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/httpd/htdocs/manual/mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html,v > retrieving revision 1.12 > diff -u -r1.12 ssl_faq.html > --- mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html 18 Jun 2008 05:42:29 -0000 1.12 > +++ mod/mod_ssl/ssl_faq.html 27 Jan 2012 18:34:58 -0000 > @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ > are done with full year value instead of abbreviating to two digits. > <p> > Additionally according to a <a > - href="http://www.apache.org/docs/misc/FAQ.html#year2000";>Year 2000 > + href="../../misc/FAQ.html#year2000">Year 2000 > statement</a> from the Apache Group, the Apache webserver is Year 2000 > compliant, too. But whether OpenSSL or the underlaying Operating System > (either a Unix or Win32 platform) is Year 2000 compliant is a different > > > > > Looking at latest online FAQ for Apache 1.3 it looks even worse than > in-tree manual/FAQ.html > > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/misc/FAQ.html > > so I'm also not sure what's the option here. > > -- > best regards > q# >
my point about misc/index.html was incorrect. not to worry... i've committed your suggestion to moving FAQ.html to misc/, and updated the link in ssl_faq.html. when i have time, i'll look at what we can do with the broken links. of course, if someone beats me to it i won't be in any way offended. jmc
