On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Henning Brauer <lists-open...@bsws.de> wrote: > > please try this & report back >
Thanks Henning but I need some help :-( I got the following errors and I have attached the .rej files ========================================= # patch -p0 < patch.if_pflog Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: if_pflog.c |=================================================================== |RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_pflog.c,v |retrieving revision 1.49 |diff -u -p -r1.49 if_pflog.c |--- if_pflog.c 3 Feb 2012 01:57:50 -0000 1.49 |+++ if_pflog.c 11 Apr 2012 10:19:56 -0000 -------------------------- File to patch: sys/net/if_pflog.c Patching file sys/net/if_pflog.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 80. Hunk #2 failed at 92. Hunk #3 failed at 110. Hunk #4 failed at 180. Hunk #5 failed at 256. 5 out of 5 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/net/if_pflog.c.rej Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: pf_ioctl.c |=================================================================== |RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/pf_ioctl.c,v |retrieving revision 1.250 |diff -u -p -r1.250 pf_ioctl.c |--- pf_ioctl.c 3 Apr 2012 15:09:03 -0000 1.250 |+++ pf_ioctl.c 11 Apr 2012 10:19:57 -0000 -------------------------- File to patch: sys/net/pf_ioctl.c Patching file sys/net/pf_ioctl.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 2595. 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/net/pf_ioctl.c.rej done =========================================== Thanks Siju [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of if_pflog.c.rej] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of pf_ioctl.c.rej]
