On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Jonathan Gray <j...@jsg.id.au> wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:30:02AM -0400, Matt Dainty wrote: >> * Jonathan Gray <j...@jsg.id.au> [2012-05-24 01:23:28]: >> > As a general policy drivers do not have numbers in their name, >> > so it will have to be renamed. >> >> Yes, I got a couple of private mails stating the same, which explains >> why I hadn't seen any others. Anyway, Mike Belopuhov suggested pchpcib >> as an alternative name so I've renamed the driver to that along with >> the man pages, etc. > > I'm not sure what it should be but pch seems a bit wrong, as > the LPC device is part of the E600 chip not the EG20T PCH in this > case. It isn't clear how compatible this is across the other > chips either. Is it the sort of thing that is only compatible to > tunnel creek/e600 or other chips as well? > > On another recent Atom PCH for example, the NM10 it still has a > LPC controller and the watchdog seems to have a different register layout. >
heh, my bad, i had doubts that wdt was actually part of the cpu...
