On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 13:37, Brynet wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:09:54PM -0400, Brynet wrote: >> I wasn't sure about the interactions between getopt(3) and having an >> '-' as an optarg. >> >> Seems there isn't anything obvious, so this allows users to be hidden >> using: top -U -user
-u -user should work, did you test it? I thought getopt was smart enough to know if an argument is needed, it comes next. I think that's nicer than a different letter for command line and interactive mode.
