On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:47:16AM +0200, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote: > This no longer applies, it is probably a leftover from the days when we > had a global runqueue. Discussed with blambert. > > ok ? > > Index: sched_bsd.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/sched_bsd.c,v > retrieving revision 1.29 > diff -d -u -p -r1.29 sched_bsd.c > --- sched_bsd.c 23 Mar 2012 15:51:26 -0000 1.29 > +++ sched_bsd.c 9 Jul 2012 08:45:32 -0000 > @@ -464,16 +464,7 @@ resched_proc(struct proc *p, u_char pri) > > /* > * XXXSMP > - * Since p->p_cpu persists across a context switch, > - * this gives us *very weak* processor affinity, in > - * that we notify the CPU on which the process last > - * ran that it should try to switch. > - * > - * This does not guarantee that the process will run on > - * that processor next, because another processor might > - * grab it the next time it performs a context switch. > - * > - * This also does not handle the case where its last > + * This does not handle the case where its last > * CPU is running a higher-priority process, but every > * other CPU is running a lower-priority process. There > * are ways to handle this situation, but they're not >
If it doesn't apply it should die. ok krw@ .... Ken
