> Using puffs will induce a rewrite of all the kernel code, because the > internals are completely different (and I think a little bit more > complex, but this is a personal opinion...). > > I might share that opinon :)
> For a libfuse support in basesystem we will need to do a librefuse > like library. In this case we could perhaps keep the librefuse > frontend and only rewrite the backend. | > Which solution do you think is best ? In any case and if you need me, > I will be provide all the help I can :) > Essentially we just need the best solution to have a base acceptable fuse library. I don't know what the right answer to that is, but perhaps starting with librefuse and makeing it less refusey (and more towards compatible with a working ISC licensed fuse implementation in the kernel would be the way to go.
