On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:00:46PM +0100, Martin Pelikan wrote:
> > wfd is stdin, so doing a shutdown on it will mostly be a noop, right?
>
> Of course you're right. I was so focused on finding the bug I didn't
> look above what the fd is :-(
>
> Are you okay with removing this particular shutdown(2) line?
Yes, but it would even be better if there would be an option to get
the shutdown on EOF behaviour back.
Some servers wait until they see the shutdown from the client to finish
their work.
-Otto
