> I can't see that we would add an arch where sizeof(ptrdiff_t) != > sizeof(size_t).
We run on I32LP64 and ILP32, therefore, it seems better to match 't' to some other LONG print block, like 'D'. size_t is an high-level abstraction, not a base type.
> I can't see that we would add an arch where sizeof(ptrdiff_t) != > sizeof(size_t).
We run on I32LP64 and ILP32, therefore, it seems better to match 't' to some other LONG print block, like 'D'. size_t is an high-level abstraction, not a base type.