On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:53:50AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote: > Have you verified that we follow the RFC, and not just -00 of the draft? >
The RFC actually mentions that OpenBSD-current as of 2012 is following the specification so I think this is OK. > > On 2013 Aug 21 (Wed) at 23:40:12 -0700 (-0700), Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > :Hi, > : > :The draft is now an RFC. > :Perhaps the code should reflect those changes as well ? > : > : > :Index: sys/netinet6/frag6.c > :=================================================================== > :RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet6/frag6.c,v > :retrieving revision 1.47 > :diff -u -p -r1.47 frag6.c > :--- sys/netinet6/frag6.c 11 Jun 2013 18:15:54 -0000 1.47 > :+++ sys/netinet6/frag6.c 22 Aug 2013 06:36:35 -0000 > :@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ frag6_input(struct mbuf **mp, int *offp, > : offset += sizeof(struct ip6_frag); > : > : /* > :- * draft-gont-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-00: A host that receives an > :+ * RFC6946: A host that receives an > : * IPv6 packet which includes a Fragment Header with the "Fragment > : * Offset" equal to 0 and the "M" bit equal to 0 MUST process such > : * packet in isolation from any other packets/fragments. > : > > -- > It's better to be wanted for murder than not to be wanted at all. > -- Marty Winch > -- :wq Claudio
