Rfc 3442 is what I referred to. .... Ken On 3 Dec 2013 22:54, "Matthew Dempsky" <matt...@dempsky.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Kenneth R Westerback > <kwesterb...@rogers.com> wrote: > > Located here, the addition of the 255.255.255.255 route is not done in > the > > presence of DHO_CLASSLESS_STATIC_ROUTES. As I recall only DHO_ROUTERS and > > DHO_STATIC_ROUTES are incompatible with DHO_CLASSLESS_STATIC_ROUTES. So > > we may want this chunk to occur unconditionally. > > I'm not opposed to that per se and I don't imagine it should cause any > problems, but it would diverge somewhat from ISC DHCP's behavior. For > reference, ISC DHCP 4.2.5-P1 doesn't support > DHO_CLASSLESS_STATIC_ROUTES, the Linux client script doesn't support > DHO_STATIC_ROUTES, and the FreeBSD script only does this routing magic > for DHO_ROUTERS not DHO_STATIC_ROUTES. > > I'll try to find something authoritative on how we're 'supposed' to behave > here. >
