On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 09:10:14PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:16, Eivind Evensen wrote: > > > Index: tape.c ....
> > } > > This shouldn't be necessary. the range of deltat % 3600 certainly fits > in an int, and the range of deltat / 3600 should fit too. i hope your > backups don't take more than two billion hours. Indeed it doesn't take that much time. The funny estimates were just why I looked into these files. Because of the message above tape.c/statussig(), I thought that this was still intended to look close to optr.c/timeest() and its changes in r1.33, which was what the diff was about. I don't worry about it though, I don't think it's a problem. -- Eivind
