On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 20:09, Otto Moerbeek wrote: >> > static int >> > -insert(struct dir_info *d, void *p, size_t sz, void *f) >> > +insert(struct dir_info *d, void *p, uintptr_t sz, void *f) >> >> Doesn't it make sense for sz to stay a size_t in this case? it appears >> to still be used as an offset in here, not a pointer. no? > > Indeed, I don't see why you would change the type of the parameter here.
That is what the caller (with a chunk_info *) is casting it to.
