On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:22:44PM -0500, Adam Thompson wrote: > Given the single-threaded nature of much of the kernel, what applications do > you run where multiple CPUs makes much of a difference to OpenBSD?
Come on, a machine runs multiple processes... > > Also, switching from IDE to any of the supported SCSI, SAS or SATA disk types > also produces a noticeable improvement. I'm not sure if those are available > in every KVM implementation or just the Proxmox-integrated version... IIRC > they're available in RHEV too, so most likely they're standard. > > -Adam > > On April 17, 2014 11:34:19 AM CDT, Giancarlo Razzolini <[email protected]> > wrote: > >Em 17-04-2014 07:34, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda escreveu: > >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Brandon Mercer > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> It will take me about that long to newfs the 10 kvm's I plan on > >using ;) > >>> > >>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 5:09 AM, Otto Moerbeek <[email protected]> > >wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:16:00PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Thursday, April 17, 2014, Otto Moerbeek <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> ... > >>>>> > >>>>>> But bear in mind that ffs2 has more overhead in terms of > >metadata. > >>>>>> IMO, making it the default is not a good idea. > >>>>>> > >>>>> You have fewer than 24 years left to enjoy FFS v1... > >>>> and I plan to enjoy every minute of that period! > >>>> > >>>> -Otto > >>>> > >>>> > >> I found it really fast to work with kvm/openbsd if you use -drive > >> ...,if=virtio ... > >> like 4x-5x times faster than if=ide -the default- > >> > >I use everything virtio and the performance difference is quite > >notable. > >The only complain is that openbsd won't see more than one processor, no > >matter what you do. > > > >-- > >Giancarlo Razzolini > >GPG: 4096R/77B981BC > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
