> > Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:31:48 +0200 > > From: Tristan Le Guern <tlegu...@bouledef.eu> > > > > Hi, > > > > This patch for /usr/share/misc/getopt enforces the use of getprogname() > > instead of __progname. > > > > Is this desirable? If so I also have a patch for style(9). > > getprogname(3) isn't really more portable than __progname, and the > latter is probably slightly more efficient (smaller code). So I don't > really see the point.
getprogname(3) has the potential to be more portable, so I think the suggestion is valid.
