Hi Theo,

Theo Buehler wrote on Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 02:45:53PM +0200:

> This confused me quite a bit when I first read it.  After lint was
> unhooked from the tree, there remain only seven targets in
> <bsd.prog.mk>:
> all, clean, cleandir, depend, includes, install, and tags.
> 
> Same goes for <bsd.subdir.mk> and <bsd.lib.mk>.

Committed, thanks.
  Ingo


> Index: bsd.README
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/mk/bsd.README,v
> retrieving revision 1.57
> diff -u -p -r1.57 bsd.README
> --- bsd.README        9 Oct 2014 04:44:09 -0000       1.57
> +++ bsd.README        13 Oct 2014 12:41:24 -0000
> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ The include file <bsd.prog.mk> handles b
>  more source files, along with their manual pages.  It has a limited number
>  of suffixes, consistent with the current needs of the BSD tree.
>  
> -It has eight targets:
> +It has seven targets:
>  
>       all:
>               build the program and its manual page
> @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ If foo has multiple source files, add th
>  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>  
>  The include file <bsd.subdir.mk> contains the default targets for building
> -subdirectories.  It has the same eight targets as <bsd.prog.mk>: all, 
> +subdirectories.  It has the same seven targets as <bsd.prog.mk>: all, 
>  clean, cleandir, depend, includes, install, and tags.  For all of
>  the directories listed in the variable SUBDIR, the specified directory 
>  will be visited and the target made.  There is also a default target which
> @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ yacc that allow multiple lex and yacc ta
>  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>  
>  The include file <bsd.lib.mk> has support for building libraries.  It has
> -the same eight targets as <bsd.prog.mk>: all, clean, cleandir, depend,
> +the same seven targets as <bsd.prog.mk>: all, clean, cleandir, depend,
>  includes, install, and tags.  It has a limited number of suffixes,
>  consistent with the current needs of the BSD tree.
>  

Reply via email to