On 2015/02/07 08:11, David Gwynne wrote: > > > On 7 Feb 2015, at 6:49 am, Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 2015/02/07 06:41, David Gwynne wrote: > >> man -k ralink confused me for a sec > >> > >> ok? > > > > Yes it does, but it isn't the only one, > > > > $ man -k a/b/g/n > > $ man -k a/g/n > > athn(4) - Atheros IEEE 802.11a/g/n wireless network device > > iwn(4) - Intel WiFi Link and Centrino IEEE 802.11a/g/n wireless network > > devices > > otus(4) - Atheros USB IEEE 802.11a/g/n wireless network device > > ral(4) - Ralink Technology IEEE 802.11a/g/n wireless network device > > run(4) - Ralink Technology USB IEEE 802.11a/g/n wireless network device > > > > damien zapped them all: > > > > --------------------- > > PatchSet 5683 > > Date: 2009/10/26 19:01:55 > > Author: damien > > Branch: HEAD > > Tag: (none) > > Log: > > s/Draft-N/n/ > > remove 'b' if 'g' is supported since 'g' => 'b'. > > im not smart enough to know that. > > > > > Members: > > cardbus.4:1.63->1.64 > > iwn.4:1.21->1.22 > > otus.4:1.8->1.9 > > pci.4:1.278->1.279 > > ral.4:1.93->1.94 > > run.4:1.20->1.21 > > usb.4:1.111->1.112 > > > > --------------------- > > >
I had to think about it, it's not obvious. I wouldn't be opposed to changing them all to a/b/g/n ... (or a/b/g to avoid getting peoples' hopes up ;-)
