Hello,

we hit this problem while building PF on Solaris, where sizeof(sa_family_t) == 2
patch below fixes the problem for Solaris.

regards
sasha

cvs diff -p output:

------8<------8<------8<------

Index: pfvar.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/pfvar.h,v
retrieving revision 1.416
diff -p -r1.416 pfvar.h
*** pfvar.h     16 Jul 2015 21:14:21 -0000      1.416
--- pfvar.h     16 Jul 2015 22:10:10 -0000
*************** extern void                      pf_print_flags(u_int8_t);
*** 1791,1797 ****
  extern struct ifnet           *sync_ifp;
  extern struct pf_rule          pf_default_rule;
  extern void                    pf_addrcpy(struct pf_addr *, struct pf_addr *,
!                                   u_int8_t);
  void                           pf_rm_rule(struct pf_rulequeue *,
                                    struct pf_rule *);
  void                           pf_purge_rule(struct pf_ruleset *,
--- 1791,1797 ----
  extern struct ifnet           *sync_ifp;
  extern struct pf_rule          pf_default_rule;
  extern void                    pf_addrcpy(struct pf_addr *, struct pf_addr *,
!                                   sa_family_t);
  void                           pf_rm_rule(struct pf_rulequeue *,
                                    struct pf_rule *);
  void                           pf_purge_rule(struct pf_ruleset *,
*************** struct pf_os_fingerprint *
*** 1984,1990 ****
        pf_osfp_validate(void);
  
  #ifdef _KERNEL
! void                   pf_print_host(struct pf_addr *, u_int16_t, u_int8_t);
  
  int                    pf_get_transaddr(struct pf_rule *, struct pf_pdesc *,
                            struct pf_src_node **, struct pf_rule **);
--- 1984,1990 ----
        pf_osfp_validate(void);
  
  #ifdef _KERNEL
! void                   pf_print_host(struct pf_addr *, u_int16_t, 
sa_family_t);
  
  int                    pf_get_transaddr(struct pf_rule *, struct pf_pdesc *,
                            struct pf_src_node **, struct pf_rule **);

Reply via email to