On 24/08/15(Mon) 22:40, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 01:37:00PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > --- net/route.c 19 Aug 2015 13:27:38 -0000 1.223 > > +++ net/route.c 20 Aug 2015 11:25:54 -0000 > > @@ -570,12 +570,8 @@ rtdeletemsg(struct rtentry *rt, u_int ta > > info.rti_flags = rt->rt_flags; > > ifp = rt->rt_ifp; > > error = rtrequest1(RTM_DELETE, &info, rt->rt_priority, &rt, tableid); > > - > > Should we add a comment here, why we must keep the route during > rt_missmsg()?
Actually, there's already a comment...
