Walter Neto wrote: > Hi guys, > > Studying more about wapbl, I saw It is a little faster than SU+J and so much > more easy to implement, correct me if I’m wrong, please. > > About a diff with working code, my next would be one with it, but not with > the whole thing working, It was to be homeopathic. > > But now I have doubts whether to continue SU+J implementation or to implement > WAPBL (more easy, cause Pedro had implemented in bitrig) > > Any suggestions?
My suggestion would be WAPBL (despite the name :)). A note about diffs. We like to see small diffs because they are easy to review and less likely to break things, but there should be a finish line in sight too. A WIP diff is less exciting because we don't know how things will progress (I'm guilty of this myself). It can help to show a diff early. Like I think sending the SUJ diff early was wise, since we can point you in a better direction. Just mention when sending a diff whether it's an actual proposal or just a preview of what's to come.
