On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Timo Buhrmester <fstd.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Can you clarify why you used int instead of int32_t? > Considering that > - the comment around it said ``Find an integer type that is at least 32 > bits'' > - int may be less than 32 bits wide (C99 5.2.4.2.1)
While true in a standards sense, OpenBSD will never run on an arch where int is less than 32 bits. Are there people porting OpenBSD's ksh to OSes where int can be 16 bits? If so, *they* need to step up and argue for making to code less readable. Uglifying the code for a hypothetical port is not our way. Philip Guenther
