On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 02:57:47PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > Sebastien Marie(sema...@openbsd.org) on 2015.09.20 14:27:01 +0200: > > Hi, > > > > Mentions that using systrace(4) isn't possible when a program has called > > tame(2). > > > > Comments ? OK ? > > -- > > Sebastien Marie > > > > Index: lib/libc/sys/tame.2 > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/sys/tame.2,v > > retrieving revision 1.27 > > diff -u -p -r1.27 tame.2 > > --- lib/libc/sys/tame.2 11 Sep 2015 09:01:16 -0000 1.27 > > +++ lib/libc/sys/tame.2 20 Sep 2015 12:26:47 -0000 > > @@ -431,3 +431,7 @@ The > > .Fn tame > > system call appeared in > > .Ox 5.8 . > > +.Sh CAVEATS > > +The use of > > +.Xr systrace 4 > > +in a tamed program is disable. > > there is a "d" missing at the end. > > And "In a tamed program, systrace(4) is disabled" sounds better to me, but > jmc might have an opinion on that. > > This could also be mentioned in the systrace(4) manpage, after all, if your > wondering why systrace doesnt work, you won't know that the program is > tamed and thus won't look in tame(2)? >
i wouldn;t worry about the exact wording too much, but it probably does make sense to flag it in systrace(4) too. jmc
