On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Michael McConville <mmcco...@sccs.swarthmore.edu> wrote: > Philip Guenther wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Jonathan Gray <j...@jsg.id.au> wrote: >> > This isn't just removing support for gcc 2 it is removing support >> > for anything that doesn't define __GNUC__ and implement all the gnu >> > attributes which isn't what we want. >> >> Yep. We've now seen a couple diffs labeled "remove gcc2 support" >> which were unable to contain themselves to that. If you want to >> suggest something contentious, then say so instead of rolling it into >> something everyone can agree on...and then don't be surprised when >> it's contentious. If you want to do something sure and simple, then >> DO SOMETHING SIMPLE. > > I wasn't trying to suggest something contentious, I just (incorrectly) > thought that there were different cdefs.h copies for the kernel and > userland. Mistake acknowledged.
Sure, but seeing as someone else made a parallel flub reminding the list of a pothole in getting their diffs committed seemed wise. Philip
