On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:12:43 +0200, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote: > I consider sym to be trustworthy here, because it's supplied by the > caller. It's not a pointer into the binary file.
Fair enough. - todd
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:12:43 +0200, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote: > I consider sym to be trustworthy here, because it's supplied by the > caller. It's not a pointer into the binary file.
Fair enough. - todd